105 4 MODELS OF RISK SELECTION IN MATERNAL AND NEWBORN CARE Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1046 13 of 15 Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10 .3390/ijerph19031046/s1: Table S1: Moment of routinely scheduled discussions, attending professionals, and the way in which rou-tinely scheduled discussions take place (n,%). Table S2: Reasons of nine maternal care collaborations for reversing the change in the usual or-ganization of tasks and responsibilities in risk selection. Table S3: Levels of satisfaction related to the model of care (n,%). Author Contributions: Conceptualization, B.G., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Methodology, B.G., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Validation, B.G., C.V., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Formal Analysis, B.G. and C.V.; Investigation, B.G.; Data Curation. B.G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, B.G.; Writing—Review and Editing, B.G., C.V., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Supervision, A.d.J.; and Project Administration, B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical approval was requested from the Medical Ethics Review Committee of VU University Medical Centre. The approval was waived, because the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act did not apply to this study (no. 2019.505). Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Data Availability Statement: Datasets were not publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study. Acknowledgments: We thank Elisa Oomen for helping us with the questionnaire. We thank the Midwifery Academies, Perined data register, and the College for Perinatal Care for providing us with an overview of primary midwifery care practices. We thank Lilian Peters, the College for Perinatal Care, the Federation of Maternity Care Collaborations, the Child and Hospital Foundation, the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives, and Hajo Wildschut for providing feedback on the questionnaire, and the primary care midwives, hospitalbased midwives, and research assistants for pilot testing the questionnaire. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. The Lancet. Lancet Series Every Newborn. 2014. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/series/everynewborn (accessed on 30 September 2021). 2. The Lancet. The Lancet Series Midwifery. 2014. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/series/midwifery (accessed on 30 September 2021). 3. The Lancet. The Lancet Series Child Death in High-Income Countries. 2014. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/ series/child-death-in-high-income-countries (accessed on 30 September 2021). 4. The Lancet. The Lancet Series Maternal Health. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-health-2016 (accessed on 30 September 2021). 5. Glasziou, P.; Straus, S.; Brownlee, S.; Trevena, L.; Dans, L.; Guyatt, G.; Elshaug, A.G.; Janett, R.; Saini, V. Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world. Lancet 2017, 390, 169–177. [CrossRef] 6. Brownlee, S.; Chalkidou, K.; Doust, J.; Elshaug, A.G.; Glasziou, P.; Heath, I.; Nagpal, S.; Saini, V.; Srivastava, D.; Chalmers, K.; et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017, 390, 156–168. [CrossRef] 7. Miller, S.; Abalos, E.; Chamillard, M.; Ciapponi, A.; Colaci, D.; Comandé, D.; Diaz, V.; Geller, S.; Hanson, C.; Langer, A.; et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: A pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet 2016, 388, 2176–2192. [CrossRef] 8. Renfrew, M.J.; McFadden, A.; Bastos, M.H.; Campbell, J.; Channon, A.A.; Cheung, N.F.; Silva, D.R.A.D.; Downe, S.; Kennedy, H.P.; Malata, A.; et al. Midwifery and quality care: Findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet 2014, 384, 1129–1145. [CrossRef] 9. Souza, J.P.; Gülmezoglu, A.M.; Vogel, J.; Carroli, G.; Lumbiganon, P.; Qureshi, Z.; Costa, M.J.; Fawole, B.; Mugerwa, Y.; Nafiou, I.; et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): A cross-sectional study. Lancet 2013, 381, 1747–1755. [CrossRef] 10. Goodarzi, B.; Walker, A.; Holten, L.; Schoonmade, L.; Teunissen, P.; Schellevis, F.; de Jonge, A. Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE2020, 15, e0234252. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 11. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. Beter Weten: Een Beter Begin. Samen Sneller Naar Een Betere Zorg Rond de Zwangerschap (Knowing Better. A Better Start. Together Faster towards Better Care Perinatal Care); RIVM: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2020. Available online: https://www.rivm.nl/publicaties/beter-weten-beter-begin-samen-sneller-naar-betere-zorg-rond-zwangerschap (accessed on 1 October 2021). 2022, 19, 1046 13 of 15 Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10 .3390/ijerph19031046/s1: Table S1: Moment of routinely scheduled discussions, attending professionals, and the way in which rou-tinely scheduled discussions take place (n,%). Table S2: Reasons of nine maternal care collaborations for reversing the change in the usual or-ganization of tasks and responsibilities in risk selection. Table S3: Levels of satisfaction related to the model of care (n,%). Author Contributions: Conceptualization, B.G., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Methodology, B.G., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Validation, B.G., C.V., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Formal Analysis, B.G. and C.V.; Investigation, B.G.; Data Curation. B.G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, B.G.; Writing—Review and Editing, B.G., C.V., D.B., E.F.d.V. and A.d.J.; Supervision, A.d.J.; and Project Administration, B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical approval w s requested from the Medi al Ethics Review Committee of VU University Medical Centre. The approval was waived, b cause the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act did not apply to this study (no. 2019.505). Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Data Availability Statement: Datasets were not publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study. Acknowledgments: We thank Elisa Oomen for helping us with the questionnaire. We thank the Midwifery Academi s, Perined data register, and the College for Perinatal Care for providing us with an overview of primary midwifery care practices. We thank Lilian Peters, the College for Perinatal Care, the Federation of Maternity Care Collaborations, the Child and Hospital Foundation, the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives, and Hajo Wildschut for providing feedback on the questionnaire, and the primary care midwives, hospitalbased midwives, and research assistants for pilot testing the questionnaire. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The Lancet. Lancet Series Every Newborn. 2014. Available onlin : https://www.thelancet.com/series/everynewborn (accessed on 30 September 2021). The Lancet. The Lancet Series Midwifery. 2014. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/series/midwifery (accessed on 30 September 2021). The Lancet. The Lancet Series Child Death in High-Income Countri s. 2014. Available onli : http ://www.thelancet.com/ series/child-death-in-high-income-countries (accessed on 30 September 2021). The Lancet. The Lancet Series Maternal Health. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-health-2016 (accessed on 30 September 2021). Glasziou, P.; Straus, S.; Brownlee, S.; Trevena, L.; Dans, L.; Guyatt, G.; Elshaug, A.G.; Janett, R.; Saini, V. Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world. Lancet 2017, 390, 169–177. [CrossRef] Brownlee, S.; Chalkidou, K.; Doust, J.; Elshaug, A.G.; Glasziou, P.; Heath, I.; Nagpal, S.; Saini, V.; Srivastava, D.; Chalmers, K.; et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017, 390, 156–168. [CrossRef] Miller, S.; Abalos, E.; Chamillard, M.; Ciapponi, A.; Colaci, D.; Comandé, D.; Diaz, V.; Geller, S.; Hanson, C.; Langer, A.; et al. Beyond too little, too late an too much, too soon: A pathw y towards evide e-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet 2016, 388, 2176–2192. [CrossRef] Renfrew, M.J.; McFadden, A.; Bastos, M.H.; Campbell, J.; Channon, A.A.; Cheung, N.F.; Silva, D.R.A.D.; Downe, S.; Kennedy, H.P.; Malata, A.; et al. Midwifery and quality care: Findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet 2014, 384, 1129–1145. [CrossRef] Souza, J.P.; Gülmezoglu, A.M.; Vogel, J.; Carroli, G.; Lumbiganon, P.; Qureshi, Z.; Costa, M.J.; Fawole, B.; Mugerwa, Y.; Nafiou, I.; et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (t e WHO Multicountry Surv y on Maternal and Newborn Health): A cross-sectional study. Lancet 2013, 381, 1747–1755. [CrossRef] Goodarzi, B.; Walker, A.; Holten, L.; Schoonmade, L.; Teunissen, P.; Schellevis, F.; de Jonge, A. Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE2020, 15, e0234252. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. B ter Weten: Een Beter Begi . Samen Sneller Naar Een Bet re Zo g Rond de Zwangerschap (Knowing Better. A Better Start. Together Faster owards Bette Care Perinatal Care); RIVM: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 20 . Available online: https://www.rivm.nl/publicaties/beter-weten-beter-begin-samen-sneller-naar-betere-zorg-rond-zwangerschap (accessed on 1 October 2021).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw