2019 Dec 21;19(1):428. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/ s12884-019-2512-3 15. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Apr 28; Available from: https://doi.wiley. com/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5 16. Cunningham SD, Lewis JB, Shebl FM, Boyd LM, Robinson MA, Grilo SA, et al. Group prenatal care Reduces risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: A matched cohort study. J Women’s Heal [Internet]. 2019 Jan;28(1):17–22. Available from: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2017.6817 17. Andrade-Romo Z, Heredia-Pi IB, Fuentes-Rivera E, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Cacho LBB, Jurkiewicz L, et al. Group prenatal care: Effectiveness and challenges to implementation. Rev Saude Publica [Internet]. 2019 Sep 27;53:85. Available from: http://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/162711 18. Offerhaus P, Jans S, Hukkelhoven C, de Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M. Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):517. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/ articles/10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3 19. Hadebe R, Seed PT, Essien D, Headen K, Mahmud S, Owasil S, et al. Can birth outcome inequality be reduced using targeted caseload midwifery in a deprived diverse inner city population? A retrospective cohort study, London, UK. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021 Nov 1;11(11):e049991. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/ lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049991 20. Wagijo MR, Crone MR, Zwicht BS, Lith JMM, Schindler Rising S, Rijnders MEB. Centering Pregnancy in the Netherlands: Who engages, who doesn’t, and why. Birth [Internet]. 2022 Jan 28; Available from: https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12610 21. Phillippi JC, Myers CR. Reasons women in Appalachia decline Centering Pregnancy care. J Midwifery Womens Health [Internet]. 2013 Sep;58(5):516–22. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ jmwh.12033 22. Beck U. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Lonodn, California, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 1992. 23. Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2012 Sep;14(6):511–31. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/136 98575.2012.701277 24. Stahl K, Hundley V. Risk and risk assessment in pregnancy – do we scare because we care? Midwifery [Internet]. 2003 Dec;19(4):298–309. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S026661380300041X 25. Robinson M, Pennell CE, McLean NJ, Tearne JE, Oddy WH, Newnham JP. Risk perception in pregnancy. Eur Psychol [Internet]. 2015 Jun 30;20(2):120–7. Available from: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/10169040/a000212 26. Lennon SL. Risk perception in pregnancy: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2016 Sep;72(9):2016–29. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.13007 27. Stone NI, Downe S, Dykes F, Rothman BK. “Putting the baby back in the body”: The re-embodiment of pregnancy to enhance safety in a free-standing birth center. Midwifery [Internet]. 2022 Jan;104:103172. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613821002527 28. Hansson SO. Philosophical perspectives on risk. Techné. 2004;8:10–35. 177 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw