29. Hansson SO. Seven myths of risk. Risk Manag [Internet]. 2005;7(2):7–17. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/3867684 30. Möller N. The concepts of risk and safety. In: Handbook of Risk Theory [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 55–85. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_3 31. Jordan RG, Murphy PA. Risk assessment and risk distortion: Finding the balance. J Midwifery Womens Health [Internet]. 2009 May 6;54(3):191–200. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.001 32. Jacobs LA. An analysis of the concept of risk. Cancer Nurs [Internet]. 2000 Feb;23(1):12–9. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00002820-200002000-00003 33. Sanz E, Gómez-López T, Martı́nez-Quintas MJ. Perception of teratogenic risk of common medicines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2001 Mar;95(1):127–31. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0301211500003754 34. Teigen KH, Brun W. Anticipating the future: Appraising risk and uncertainty. In: Ranyard R, Crozier WR, Svenson O, editors. Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations. London, New York: Routledge; 35. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus. 1986;59(4):S251–78. 36. Willems S, Albers C, Smeets I. Variability in the interpretation of probability phrases used in Dutch news articles — a risk for miscommunication. J Sci Commun [Internet]. 2020 Apr 6;19(02):A03. Available from: https://jcom. sissa.it/archive/19/02/JCOM_1902_2020_A03 37. Marsh A. The importance of language in maternity services. Br J Midwifery [Internet]. 2019 May 2;27(5):320–3. Available from: http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/bjom.2019.27.5.320 38. Windschitl PD, Wells GL. Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verval versus numeric methods. J Exp Psychol. 1996;2(4):343–64. 39. Büchter RB, Fechtelpeter D, Knelangen M, Ehrlich M, Waltering A. Words or numbers? Communicating risk of adverse effects in written consumer health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2014 Dec 26;14(1):76. Available from: https://bmcmedinformdecismak. biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6947-14-76 40. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Keeton K, Ubel PA. Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman’s responses? Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2007 Nov;197(5):528.e1-528.e6. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937807004747 41. Morgan DJ, Scherer LD, Korenstein D. Improving physician communication about treatment decisions. JAMA [Internet]. 2020 Sep 8;324(10):937. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/ fullarticle/2762807 42. Brust-Renck PG, Royer CE, Reyna VF. Communicating numerical risk. Rev Hum Factors Ergon [Internet]. 2013 Oct 26;8(1):235–76. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1557234X13492980 43. Bell NR, Dickinson JA, Grad R, Singh H, Kasperavicius D, Thombs BD. Understanding and communicating risk: Measures of outcome and the magnitude of benefits and harms. Can Fam Physician [Internet]. 2018;64(3):181– 5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29540382 44. Edwards A. Explaining risks: Turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ [Internet]. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):827–30. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827 45. Kotaska A. Informed consent and refusal in obstetrics: A practical ethical guide. Birth [Internet]. 2017 Sep;44(3):195–9. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12281 178 7 CHAPTER 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw