46. Dahlen H. Undone by fear? Deluded by trust? Midwifery [Internet]. 2010 Apr;26(2):156–62. Available from: 47. Van Wagner V. Risk talk: Using evidence without increasing fear. Midwifery [Internet]. 2016 Jul;38:21–8. Available from: 48. Watson K, Kottenhagen R. Informed consent, personenschade en medische aansprakelijkheid: What’s new? [Informed consent, personal injuries and medical liability: What’s new?]. 2017. 49. College ter Beoordeling vanGeneesmiddelen. BeleidsdocumentMEB 5 Bijsluiter van farmaceutische producten [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: 50. GGZ Nederland. Toelichting Wet op de Geneeskundige Behandelingsovereenkomst (WGBO)[Explanation Medical Treatment Contracts Act] [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: http://docplayer. nl/8000916-Toelichting-wet-op-de-geneeskundige-behandelingsovereenkomst-wgbo.html 51. Kelly KE. The myth of 10-6 as a definition of acceptable risk [Internet]. The Heartland Institute. 2005 [cited 2022 Feb 15]. Available from: 52. Hunter PR, Fewtrell L. Acceptable risk. In: Fewtrell L, Bartman J, editors. Water quality: Guidelines, standards an health [Internet]. London: World Health Organization; 2001. p. 207–27. Available from: http://ieeexplore. 53. Smith V, Devane D, Murphy-Lawless J. Risk in maternity care: A concept analysis. Int J Childbirth [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1;2(2):126–35. Available from: 54. Amelink‐Verburg MP, Buitendijk SE. Pregnancy and labour in the dutch maternity care system: What is normal? The role division between midwives and obstetricians. J Midwifery Womens Health [Internet]. 2010 May 6;55(3):216–25. Available from: 55. Hallgrimsdottir HK, Benner BE. ‘Knowledge is power’: Risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2014 Jan 2;16(1):7–21. Available from: 56. Van Teijlingen E. A critical analysis of the medical model as used in the study of pregnancy and childbirth. Sociol Res Online [Internet]. 2005 Jul 11;10(2):63–77. Available from: sro.1034 57. Davis-Floyd R. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2001 Nov;75:S5–23. Available from: 58. Jefford E, Jomeen J. “Midwifery abdication”: A finding from an interpretive study. Int J Childbirth [Internet]. 2015 Jan 1;5(3):116–25. Available from: 59. Cheyne H, Dalgleish L, Tucker J, Kane F, Shetty A, McLeod S, et al. Risk assessment and decision making about in-labour transfer from rural maternity care: A social judgment and signal detection analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2012 Dec 31;12(1):122. Available from: https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral. com/articles/10.1186/1472-6947-12-122 60. Page M, Mander R. Intrapartum uncertainty: A feature of normal birth, as experienced by midwives in Scotland. Midwifery [Internet]. 2014 Jan;30(1):28–35. Available from: 179 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION