76. Ersdal G, Aven T. Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf [Internet]. 2008 Feb;93(2):197–205. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095183200700018X 77. Peterwerth NH, Halek M, Schäfers R. Intrapartum risk perception–A qualitative exploration of factors affecting the risk perception of midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting. Midwifery [Internet]. 2022 Mar;106:103234. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613821003090 78. Thirlaway KJ, Heggs DA. Interpreting risk messages: Women’s responses to a health story. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2005 Jun;7(2):107–21. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ abs/10.1080/13698570500108677 79. Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2014 Jan 2;16(1):51– 67. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698575.2013.859231 80. Jomeen J. The paradox of choice in maternity care. J Neonatal Nurs [Internet]. 2012 Apr;18(2):60–2. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1355184112000336 81. Yuill C, McCourt C, Cheyne H, Leister N. Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):343. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral. com/articles/10.1186/s12884-020-03023-6 82. HeamanM, Gupton A, Gregory D. Factors influencing pregnant womenʼs perceptions of risk. MCN, Am J Matern Nurs [Internet]. 2004 Mar;29(2):111–6. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00005721-200403000-00010 83. Renn O, Rohrmann B. Cross-cultural risk perception [Internet]. Renn O, Rohrmann B, editors. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2000. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8 84. Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, Kalafat E, Van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2021 Jun;9(6):e759–72. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S2214109X21000796 85. Riddell CA, Kaufman JS, Hutcheon JA, Strumpf EC, Teunissen PW, Abenhaim HA. Effect of uterine rupture on a hospital’s future rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 Dec;124(6):1175– 81. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00006250-201412000-00015 86. Mead MMP, Kornbrot D. The influence of maternity units’ intrapartum intervention rates and midwives’ risk perception for women suitable for midwifery-led care. Midwifery [Internet]. 2004 Mar;20(1):61–71. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613803000548 87. Muoni T. Decision-making, intuition, and the midwife: Understanding heuristics. Br J Midwifery [Internet]. 2012 Jan;20(1):52–6. Available from: http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/bjom.2012.20.1.52 88. Böhm G, Brun W. Intuition and affect in risk perception and decision making. Judgm Decis Mak. 2008;3(1):1–4. 89. Steinhauer S. Decision making in midwifery: Rationality and intuition. Pract Midwife [Internet]. 2015 Apr;18(4):14–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328460 90. Barber K. The complexity of decision-making in midwifery: A case study. Br J Midwifery [Internet]. 2012 Apr;20(4):289–94. Available from: http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/bjom.2012.20.4.289 91. Daemers DOA, Van Limbeek EBM, Wijnen HAA, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, De Vries RG. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):345. 181 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw