108. Welkenhuysen M, Evers-Kiebooms G, D’Ydewalle G. The language of uncertainty in genetic risk communication: Framing and verbal versus numerical information. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2001 May;43(2):179–87. Available from: 109. Berglund A, Lindmark G. Risk assessment at the end of pregnancy is a poor predictor for complications at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet]. 2000 Oct;79(10):854–60. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm. 110. Flage R, Aven T. Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis (QRA). Reliab Risk Anal Theory Appl. 2009;2(13). 111. Rothstein H. The institutional origins of risk: A new agenda for risk research. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2006 Sep;8(3):215–21. Available from: 112. Luhmann N. Risk: A sociological theory. Berlin: De Gruyter; 1993. 113. Lankshear G, Ettorre E, Mason D. Decision-making, uncertainty and risk: Exploring the complexity of work processes in NHS delivery suites. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2005 Dec;7(4):361–77. Available from: http://www. 114. Lane K. The medical model of the body as site of risk: A case study of childbirth. In: Gabe J, editor. Medcine, health and risk. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.; 1995. 115. Beck U. World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1999. 116. Douglas M. Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus. 1990;119(4):1–16. 117. Blix-Lindström S, Johansson E, Christensson K. Midwives’ navigation and perceived power during decisionmaking related to augmentation of labour. Midwifery [Internet]. 2008 Jun;24(2):190–8. Available from: https:// 118. De Melo-Martín I, Intemann K. Interpreting evidence: Why values can matter as much as science. Perspect Biol Med [Internet]. 2012;55(1):59–70. Available from: perspectives_in_biology_and_medicine/v055/ 119. Aven T. Selective critique of risk assessments with recommendations for improving methodology and practise. Reliab Eng Syst Saf [Internet]. 2011 May;96(5):509–14. Available from: retrieve/pii/S0951832010002772 120. McGregor S. Roles, power and subjective choice. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2006 Jan;60(1):5–9. Available from: 121. Begley K, Daly D, Panda S, Begley C. Shared decision‐making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2019 Dec 23;25(6):1113–20. Available from: https:// 122. search [Internet]. National Library of Medicine. [cited 2022 Feb 16]. Available from: https:// ient-centred%5Btiab%5D+OR+cl - ient+centred%5Btiab%5D%29+AND+%28pregnancy+%5Btiab%5D+OR+birth+%5Btiab%5D+OR+mater 123. Brady S, Lee N, Gibbons K, Bogossian F. Woman-centred care: An integrative review of the empirical literature. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2019 Jun;94:107–19. Available from: S002074891930001X 124. Naughton SL, Harvey C, Baldwin A. Providing woman-centred care in complex pregnancy situations. 183 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION