Midwifery [Internet]. 2021 Nov;102:103060. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S026661382100139X 125. Hunter A, Devane D, Houghton C, Grealish A, Tully A, Smith V. Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: Thematic analysis of women’s and clinicians’ experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017 Dec 25;17(1):322. Available from: http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/ s12884-017-1521-3 126. Carolan MC. Towards understanding the concept of risk for pregnant women: Some nursing and midwifery implications. J Clin Nurs [Internet]. 2008 Aug; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ j.1365-2702.2008.02480.x 127. Lee S, Holden D, Webb R, Ayers S. Pregnancy related risk perception in pregnant women, midwives & doctors: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):335. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2467-4 128. Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Risk perception and choice of place of birth in women with high risk pregnancies: A qualitative study. Midwifery [Internet]. 2016 Jul;38:49–54. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0266613816300122 129. Van der Hulst LAM, Van Teijlingen ER, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Birnie E, Bleker OP. Dutch women’s decision-making in pregnancy and labour as seen through the eyes of their midwives. Midwifery [Internet]. 2007 Sep;23(3):279– 86. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613807000198 130. Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Ludlow J, Benness C, Phipps H. Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: The views of pregnant women and clinicians. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2008 Nov;115(12):1494–502. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14710528.2008.01892.x 131. Jenkinson B, Kruske S, Kildea S. The experiences of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: A feminist thematic analysis. Midwifery [Internet]. 2017 Sep;52:1–10. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613817303509 132. Veland H, Aven T. Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives. Reliab Eng Syst Saf [Internet]. 2013 Feb;110:34–40. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0951832012001871 133. Burton-Jeangros C, Cavalli S, Gouilhers S, Hammer R. Between tolerable uncertainty and unacceptable risks: How health professionals and pregnant women think about the probabilities generated by prenatal screening. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2013 Apr;15(2):144–61. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.10 80/13698575.2013.771737 134. Barclay L, Kornelsen J, Longman J, Robin S, Kruske S, Kildea S, et al. Reconceptualising risk: Perceptions of risk in rural and remote maternity service planning. Midwifery [Internet]. 2016 Jul;38:63–70. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613816300353 135. Dahlen H, Kumar-Hazard B, Schmied V, editors. Birthing outside the system: A canary in the colemine. Routledge; 136. HollanderMH.Birthingoutsidethesystem:Traumaandautonomyinmaternitycare[Internet].RadboudUniversity Nijmegen; 2019. Available from: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/201204/201204. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 137. Shaw J. The birth of the clinic and the advent of reproduction: Pregnancy, pathology and the medical gaze 184 7 CHAPTER 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw