in modernity. Body Soc [Internet]. 2012 Jun 24;18(2):110–38. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1177/1357034X10394666 138. Foucault M. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Taylor & Francis e-Library; 2003. 139. Kruske S, Young K, Jenkinson B, Catchlove A. Maternity care providers’ perceptions of women’s autonomy and the law. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2013 Dec 4;13(1):84. Available from: https:// bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2393-13-84 140. Davis-Floyd RE. The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 1994 Apr;38(8):1125–40. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0277953694902283 141. Maffi I, Gouilhers S. Conceiving of risk in childbirth: Obstetric discourses, medical management and cultural expectations in Switzerland and Jordan. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2019 May 19;21(3–4):185–206. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698575.2019.1621996 142. Newnham EC, McKellar L V., Pincombe JI. Documenting risk: A comparison of policy and information pamphlets for using epidural or water in labour. Women and Birth [Internet]. 2015 Sep;28(3):221–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871519215000141 143. Newnham E, Kirkham M. Beyond autonomy: Care ethics for midwifery and the humanization of birth. Nurs Ethics [Internet]. 2019 Nov 13;26(7–8):2147–57. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1177/0969733018819119 144. Cahill HA. Male appropriation and medicalization of childbirth: An historical analysis. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2001 Feb 28;33(3):334–42. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01669.x 145. Lupton D. ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Crit Public Health [Internet]. 2012 Sep;22(3):329–40. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09581596.2012.657612 146. Wagner M. Pursuing the birth machine. Camperdown: ACE Graphics; 1994. 147. Oakley A. The captured womb. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell; 1984. 148. De Vries R. Obstetric ethics and the invisible mother. Narrat Inq Bioeth [Internet]. 2017;7(3):215–20. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/680054 149. Chadwick R. Bodies that birth. Vitalizing birth politics. New York: Routledge; 2018. 150. Chadwick R. Practices of silencing birth, marginality and epistemic violence. In: Pickles C, Herring J, editors. Childbirth, vulnerability and the law. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2020. 151. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. Jewkes R, editor. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 152. Solnes Miltenburg A, van Pelt S, Meguid T, Sundby J. Disrespect and abuse in maternity care: Individual consequences of structural violence. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 2018 Aug 27;26(53):88–106. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502023 153. Davis D-A. Obstetric racism: The racial politics of pregnancy, labor, and birthing. Med Anthropol [Internet]. 2019 Oct 3;38(7):560–73. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01459740.2018.154 9389 154. Holten L, de Miranda E. Women׳s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: An exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system.’ Midwifery [Internet]. 2016 Jul;38:55–62. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613816300109 185 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw