editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0200941. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0200941 170. Vedeler C, Nilsen ABV, Blix E, Downe S, Eri TS. What women emphasise as important aspects of care in childbirth: An online survey. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2022 Mar 10;129(4):647–55. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.16926 171. Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo O, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review. Norhayati MN, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 Apr 17;13(4):e0194906. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194906 172. California Health Care Foundation. Listening to mothers in California: Results from a population based survey of women’s childbearing experiences [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Feb 16]. Available from: https://www.chcf. org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ListeningMothers2018.pdf 173. Panda S, Begley C, Daly D. Influence of women’s request and preference on the rising rate of caesarean section – A comparison of reviews. Midwifery [Internet]. 2020 Sep;88:102765. Available from: https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613820301376 174. National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Feb 16]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/mat-transformation/implementingbetter-births/mat-review/#:~:text=National Maternity Review report&text=The National Maternity Review report,significantly over the last decade. 175. McCourt C, Weaver J, StathamH, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Elective cesarean section and decision making: A critical review of the literature. Birth [Internet]. 2007 Mar;34(1):65–79. Available from: https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00147.x 176. Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, et al. Women’s preference for caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2011 Mar;118(4):391–9. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14710528.2010.02793.x 177. De Vries RG, Low LK, Bogdan-Lovis E (Libby). Choosing surgical birth: Desire and the nature of bioethical advice. In: Lindemann H, Verkerk M, Walker MU, editors. Naturalized Bioethics [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 42–64. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ CBO9781139167499A013/type/book_part 178. O’Donovan C, O’Donovan J. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Birth [Internet]. 2018 Jun;45(2):109–19. Available from: https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12319 179. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. BMJ [Internet]. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):961–4. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/ bmj.325.7370.961 180. Mancey-Jones M, Brugha RF. Using perinatal audit to promote change: A review. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 1997 Jan 1;12(3):183–92. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/heapol/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ heapol/12.3.183 181. Crawford R. Risk ritual and the management of control and anxiety in medical culture. Heal An Interdiscip J Soc Study Heal Illn Med [Internet]. 2004 Oct 24;8(4):505–28. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/ 187 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw