Proefschrift

49. Reed R. Herstory. In: Reclaiming childbirth as a rite of passage. Yandina: World Witch Press; 2021. 50. Donnison J. Midwives and medical men. A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth. 2nd ed. London: Historical Publications; 1988. 51. Willis E. Medical dominance: The division of labour in Australian health care. London: Routledge; 1989. 52. Scamell M, Alaszewski A. Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the evernarrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health Risk Soc [Internet]. 2012 Apr;14(2):207–21. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698575.2012.661041 53. Cahill HA. Male appropriation and medicalization of childbirth: An historical analysis. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2001 Feb 28;33(3):334–42. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01669.x 54. Arney WR. Power and the profession of obstetrics. University of Chicago Press; 1982. 55. O’Dowd MJ, E.E. P. The history of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2000. 56. Loudon I. The transformation of maternal mortality. BMJ [Internet]. 1992;305:1557–60. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC1884697/pdf/bmj00105-0049.pdf 57. Drife JO. The history of labour induction: How did we get here? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2021 Nov;77:3–14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1521693421001000 58. Baskett TF. Operative vaginal delivery: An historical perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2019 Apr;56:3–10. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1521693418301810 59. Reali G. Forty years of anti-D immunoprophylaxis. Blood Transfus [Internet]. 2007 Jan;5(1):3–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204744 60. Davis-Floyd R. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2001 Nov;75:S5–23. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1016/S0020-7292%2801%2900510-0 61. MacKenzie Bryers H, Van Teijlingen E. Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery [Internet]. 2010 Oct;26(5):488–96. Available from: https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0266613810001178 62. Walsh D. Childbirth and risk. 2014. 63. Leavitt JWJW. Brought to bed: Childbearing in America, 1750 to 1950. New York: NY University Press; 1986. 64. Hopwood N, Flemming R, Kassell L, editors. Reproduction: Antiquity to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. 65. Davis DL, Walker K. Re-discovering the material body in midwifery through an exploration of theories of embodiment. Midwifery [Internet]. 2010 Aug;26(4):457–62. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0266613808000909 66. Walsh DJ. Childbirth embodiment: Problematic aspects of current understandings. Sociol Health Illn [Internet]. 2010 Mar;32(3):486–501. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14679566.2009.01207.x 67. Federici S. Caliban and the witch. Autonomedia; 2004. 68. Davison C. Feminism, midwifery and the medicalisation of birth. Br J Midwifery [Internet]. 2020 Dec 2;28(12):810–1. Available from: http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/bjom.2020.28.12.810 69. Wagner M. Pursuing the birth machine. Camperdown: ACE Graphics; 1994. 70. Oakley A. The captured womb. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell; 1984. 71. Rich A. Of women born. W. W. Norton & Company; 1995. 33 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw