Proefschrift

64 2 CHAPTER 2 Lupton, D. (2013). Risk (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, 124–156. MacDonald, K. M. (1995). Patriarchy and professions. In The sociology of the professions (1st ed.)., London: SAGE Publications. MacKenzie Bryers, H., & van Teijlingen, E. (2010). Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery, 26(5), 488–496. Marland, H., & Raffety, A. M. (1997). Midwives, society and childbirth: Debates and controversies in the modern period (1st ed.). London: Routledge. Martin, G. P., Currie, G., & Finn, R. (2009). Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the ‘modernization’ of the medical workforce. Social Science & Medicine, 68(7), 1191–1198. Ministerie van Binnenlandsche zaken. (1865). De wet regelende de uitoefening der geneeskunst [Law regulating the practice of medicine]. ’s-Gravenhage: Author. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiëne. (1981). Statistische gegevens over verloskundige zorg 1960-1979 [Statistics of maternal and newborn care 1960-1979]. Leidschendam: Author. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid Welzijn en Sport. (1993). Wet op de beroepen in de individuele gezondheidszorg [Individual healthcare professions act]. ’s-Gravenhage: Auhtor. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid Welzijn en Sport. (2017). Zorg rond zwangerschap en geboorte. Verslag van een algemeen overleg. [Care during pregnancy and birth. Report of a general consultation of the Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport]. Den Haag: Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal. Nancarrow, S. A., & Borthwick, A. M. (2005). Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(7), 897–919. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kinderartsen, Landelijke Huisartsen Vereniging, Nederlandse Organisatie van Verloskundigen, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie, & Nederlandse Huisarsten Genootschap. (1986). WBK 48 t/m 52. Response of the professional organisations represented in the SGKL to the SGKL’s draft report. Netherlands: Author. Oakley, A. (1984). The captured womb. A history of the medical care of pregnant women (1st ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Oei, G., & Derks, J. B. (2015). Geboorte veiliger voor moeder en kind [Safer birth for mother and baby]. Medisch contact, 65(24), 4–7. Offerhaus, P. (2015). Patterns in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Trends and variation in intrapartum referrals. Netherlands: Radbout University Nijmegen. Offerhaus, P., Otten, W., Boxem-Tiemessen, J. C. G., de Jonge, A., van der Pal-de Bruin, K. M., Scheepers, P. L. H., & Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M. (2015). Variation in intrapartum referral rates in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands: A discrete choice experiment. Midwifery, 31(4), e69–e78. Perdok, H., Mokkink, L., van Dillen, J., Westerneng, M., Jans, S., Mol, B. W., & de Jonge, A. (2014). Opinions of maternity care professionals about integration of care during labor for “moderate risk” indications: A delphi study in the Netherlands. Birth, 41(2), 195–205. Powell, A. E., & Davies, H. T. O. (2012). The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries. Social Science & Medicine, 75(5), 807–814. Reiger, K. M., & Lane, K. L. (2009). Working together: Collaboration between midwives and doctors in public hospitals. Australian Health Review, 33(2), 315. Renfrew, M. J., Homer, C. S., Downe, S., McFadden, A., Muir, N., Prentice, T., & ten HoopeBender, P. (2014). An executive summary for the Lancet’s series ‘Midwifery’. The Lancet, (8). Retrieved from https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/stories/series/midwifery/midwifery_exec_summ.pdf Riteco, J. A., & Hingstman, L. (1991). Evaluatie invoering ‘Verloskundige Indicatielijst’ [Evaluation of the implementation of “the list of medical indications”]. Utrecht: NIVEL. Rivo, J., Amyx, M., Pingray, V., Casale, R., Fiorillo, A., Krupitzki, H., …Belizán, J. M. (2018). Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: A cross-sectional study. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15122 Roome, S., Hartz, D., Tracy, S., & Welsh, A. (2016). Why such differing stances? A review of position statements on home birth from professional colleges. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 123(3), 376–382. Rothman, B. K. (2014). Pregnancy, birth and risk: An introduction. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 1–6. Rothman, B. K. (2016). A bun in the oven. How the food and birth movements resist industrialization (1st ed.). New York: New York University Press. 26 B. Goodarzi et al.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw