discrete choice experiment. Midwifery. 2015; 31:e69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.005 PMID: 25660846 20. Scherjon S. A comparison between the organization of obstetrics in Denmark and The Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986; 93:684–9. PMID: 3730337 21. Hemminki E, Heino A, Gissler M. Should births be centralised in higher level hospitals? Experiences from regionalised health care in Finland. BJOG. 2011; 118:1186–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14710528.2011.02977.x PMID: 21609379 22. Papiernik E, Keith LG. The regionalization of perinatal care in France—description of a missing policy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995; 61:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(95)02107-i PMID: 7556849 23. Reynolds J., Yudkin PL, Bull MJV. General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988; 38:307–10. PMID: 3255826 24. Lagendijk J, Vos AA, Bertens LCM, Denktas S, Bonsel GJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Antenatal non-medical risk assessment and care pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018; 33:579–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0387-7 PMID: 29605891 25. Offerhaus PM, de Jonge A, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Scheepers PLH, LagroJanssen ALM. Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000–2008: A descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 807,437 low risk births. Midwifery. 2015; 31:648–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.013 PMID: 26203475 26. Tucker J. Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2003; 12:286–90. 27. Giles W, Bisits A, Knox M, Madsen G, Smith R. The effect of fetal fibronectin testing on admissions to a tertiary maternal-fetal medicine unit and cost savings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182:439–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70236-5 PMID: 10694349 28. Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes—a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108(2):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG. 0000226862.78768.5c PMID: 16880298 29. Matthey S, Souter K, Mortimer K, Stephens C, Sheridan-Magro A. Routine antenatal maternal screening for current mental health: evaluation of a change in the use of the Edinburgh Depression Scale in clinical practice. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016; 19:367–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-0150570-8 PMID: 26349571 30. Martijn L, Jacobs A, Amelink-Verburg M, Wentzel R, Buitendijk S, Wensing M. Adverse outcomes in maternity care for women with a low risk profile in The Netherlands: a case series analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:219. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-219 PMID: 24286376 31. Koshida S, Ono T, Tsuji S, Murakami T, Takahashi K. Recommendations for preventing stillbirth: a regional population-based study in Japan during 2007–2011. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015; 235:145–9. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.235.145 PMID: 25746158 32. Knight M. The findings of the MBRRACE-UK confidential enquiry into maternal deaths and morbidity. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2018; 29(1):21–3. 33. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8(1):19–32. 34. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 PMID: 20854677 35. Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48 PMID: 23522333 36. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467. https://doi. org/10.7326/M18-0850 PMID: 30178033 37. Mendeley Ltd. Mendeley [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 24]. https://www.mendeley.com/ 38. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019) [Internet]. Cochrane; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 4]. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook 39. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 PMID: 19671152 40. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 PMID: 18616818 ONE Risk selection in maternal and newborn care ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234252 June 8, 2020 14 / 22 82 3 CHAPTER 3
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw