169. Offerhaus PM, Geerts C, de Jonge A, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Twisk JWR, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:42. 170. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm, a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press; 2001. 364 p. 171. Oliver A. Equity of access to health care: outlining the foundations for action. J Epidemiol Community Heal. 2004 Aug; 58:655–8. 172. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum. 1989; 1989(1):139–67. 173. Haddrill R, Jones GL, Anumba D, Mitchell C. A tale of two pregnancies: a critical interpretive synthesis of women’s perceptions about delayed initiation of antenatal care. Women and Birth. 2018; 31(3):220– 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.017 PMID: 29037485 174. Hajizadeh S, Ramezani Tehrani F, Simbar M, Farzadfar F. Factors influencing the use of prenatal care: a systematic review. J Midwifery Reprod Heal. 2016; 4:544–57. 175. Kantor E, Guglielminotti J, Azria E, Luton D, Laurent M, Oury J-F, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and utilization of anesthetic care during pregnancy and delivery. Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep; 125(3):925– 33. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002275 PMID: 28708666 176. Konstantina D. Access to maternal health and midwifery for vulnerable groups in the EU. 2019. 177. Small MJ, Allen TK, Brown HL. Global disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug; 41(5):318–22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2017.04.009 PMID: 28669415 178. Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, et al. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019 Dec; 16:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 PMID: 31182118 179. Kramer MR, Strahan AE, Preslar J, Zaharatos J, St Pierre A, Grant JE, et al. Changing the conversation: applying a health equity framework to maternal mortality reviews. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec; 221(6):609.e1–609.e9. 180. Avery MD, Bell AD, Bingham D, Corry MP, Delbanco SF, Leavitt SG, et al. Blueprint for advancing high-value maternity care through physiologic childbearing [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 6]. https:// www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/health/reports/maternity-blueprint.html 181. The International MotherBaby Childbirth Organization, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetetrics. The International Childbirth Initiative (ICI) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 6]. https://www. internationalchildbirth.com/ 182. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 6]. p. 152. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ maternal_perinatal_health/anc-positive-pregnancy-experience/en/ 183. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 6]. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/ 184. Hundley VA, Cruickshank FM, Lang GD, Glazener CMA, Milne JM, Turner M, et al. Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care. BMJ. 1994 Nov 26; 309 (6966):1400–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1400 PMID: 7819846 185. Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, Elshaug AG, Glasziou P, Heath I, et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet. 2017; 390(10090):156–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(16)32585-5 PMID: 28077234 186. Berger TM. Decisions in the gray zone: evidence-based or culture-based? J Pediatr. 2010 Jan; 156 (1):7–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.08.044 PMID: 20006758 187. Bryar R, Sinclair M. Theory for Midwifery Practice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2011. 188. Burton-Jeangros C, Cavalli S, Gouilhers S, Hammer R. Between tolerable uncertainty and unacceptable risks: how health professionals and pregnant women think about the probabilities generated by prenatal screening. Health Risk Soc. 2013 Apr; 15(2):144–61. 189. Cheyne H, Dalgleish L, Tucker J, Kane F, Shetty A, McLeod S, et al. Risk assessment and decision making about in-labour transfer from rural maternity care: a social judgment and signal detection analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-122 PMID: 23114289 190. Lankshear G, Ettorre E, Mason D. Decision-making, uncertainty and risk: exploring the complexity of work processes in NHS delivery suites. Health Risk Soc. 2005 Dec; 7(4):361–77. 191. Main E., Morton CH, Hopkins D, Giuliani G, Melsop K, Gould JB. Cesarean deliveries, outcomes, and opportunities for change in California: toward a public agenda for maternity care safety and quality ONE Risk selection in maternal and newborn care ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234252 June 8, 2020 21 / 22 89 3 TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF RISK SELECTION
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw