72 Chapter 3 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL SUPPLEMENT S3.1 Procedure Participants were recruited via public advertisements, (online) social media, and mental health facilities. They were briefed about the study and underwent a comprehensive telephone screening during which in- and exclusion criteria were assessed and informed consent was discussed. Inclusion criteria for families with an adolescent without psychopathology were no diagnoses of any (neuro)psychiatric disorders in the two years leading up to the study and no lifetime diagnosis of MDD/dysthymia. Inclusion criteria for families with an adolescent with MDD/dysthymia were that adolescents met criteria for one of these current primary diagnoses, verified with the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS; (Kaufman et al., 1996)). Families with an adolescent with MDD/dysthymia could not participate if the adolescent met criteria for a primary diagnosis of another current (neuro)psychiatric disorder or a comorbid psychosis, substance use disorder, or mental retardation. Additional exclusion criteria were incompatibilities with MRI scanning (e.g., metal implants, pregnancy). When eligible for participation, they were invited for two appointments: An assessment day in the lab and an MRI session on a separate day. Prior to the first appointment, participants were asked to fill out an online questionnaire battery including demographic and psychosocial measures, including childhood emotional maltreatment, anxiety- and depression severity, and state self-esteem. During the first appointment, they performed parent-adolescent interaction tasks together with their child and filled out additional questionnaires, and participants’ current Axis-I psychopathology based on DSM-IV was assessed with the full version of the semi-structured Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.; Dutch version 5.0.0), except for the optional module about antisocial personality disorders (Sheehan et al., 1998). The interview was taken by trained Psychology Master students who held the interview faceto-face. During the second appointment, participants underwent an MRI scan at the LUMC in Leiden, the Netherlands (median of days between the first and second appointment = 37; range 7-265 days). Prior to the scan, they filled out a set of questionnaires, received instructions about the MRI tasks, and performed some practice trials. Participants performed three tasks in the MRI scanner: The eye contact task, which is the focus of the present study (Wever et al. (2022) for analyses of task effects), a parental empathy task (Wever et al., 2021), and a vicarious social feedback task (van Houtum et al., 2021). Upon completion of the MRI scans, participants were fully debriefed about the goals of the study and received a monetary compensation for participation and travel expenses. Participants provided written informed consent for each individual testing day.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw