& 163 REFERENCES Bourke, J. (2022). Disgrace. Global reflections on sexual violence. Reaktion Books. Brankley, A. E., Babchishin, K. M., Chankin, L., Barsetti, I., & Hanson, R. K. (2019). ACUTE-2007 evaluator workbook: Revised 2019. Public Safety Canada. Brankley, A. E., Babchishin, K. M., & Hanson, R. K. (2021). STABLE-2007 Demonstrates predictive and incremental validity in assessing risk-relevant propensities for sexual offending: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 33(1), 34-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871572 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis. A practical guide. Sage. Briganti, G., Kempenaers, C., Braun, S., Fried, E. I., & Linkowski, P. (2018). Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults. Psychiatry research, 265, 87–92. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.082 Briganti, G., Scutari, M., & McNally, R. J. (2022). A tutorial on bayesian networks for psychopathology researchers. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000479 Bringmann, L. F., Hamaker, E. L., Vigo, D. E., Aubert, A., Borsboom, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2017). Changing dynamics: Time-varying autoregressive models using generalized additive modeling. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000085 Brouillette-Alarie, S., Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L.-M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23(1), 96–111. https://doi. org/10.1177/1073191114568114 Brouillette-Alarie, S., Lee, S. C., Longpré, N., & Babchishin, K. M. (2022). An examination of the latent constructs in risk tools for individuals who sexually offend: Applying multidimensional Item response theory to the Static-2002R. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221076373 Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. Secker & Warburg. Burger, J., Isvoranu, A. M., Lunansky, G., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Epskamp, S., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Fried, E. I., Borsboom, D., & Blanken, T. F. (2022). Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in crosssectional data. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000471 Burger, J., van der Veen, D. C., Robinaugh, D. J., Quax, R., Riese, H., Schoevers, R. A., & Epskamp, S. (2020). Bridging the gap between complexity science and clinical practice by formalizing idiographic theories: A computational model of functional analysis. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-02001558-1 Carvalho, J., Rosa, P. J., & Pereira, B. (2021). Dynamic risk factors characterizing aggressive sexual initiation by female college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5-6), 2455–2477. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260518760010 Castro, D., Ferreira, F., de Castro, I., Rodrigues, A. R., Correia, M., Ribeiro, J., & Ferreira, T. B. (2019). The differential role of central and bridge symptoms in deactivating psychopathological networks. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02448 Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860-864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic. Cortoni, F., Hanson, R. K., & Coache, M.-È. (2010). The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 22(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210372142 Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M., Mottus, R., Waldorp, L. J., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003 Constantin, M. A., Schuurman, N. K., & Vermunt, J. (2021). A general Monte Carlo method for sample size analysis in the context of network models. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j5v7u Craig, L. A., & Rettenberger, M. (2018). An etiological approach to sexual offender assessment: CAse Formulation Incorporating Risk Assessment (CAFIRA). Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(6), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11920-018-0904-0 Craig, L. A. & Rettenberger, M. (2021). Forensic case formulation. In: J. M. Brown & M. A. H. Brown (Eds). The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology (2d edition, pp. 835-858). Cambridge University Press. Craig, L. A., & Rettenberger, M. (2022). Towards an integration of risk assessment, case formulation, and forensic neuroscience. In: K. Uzieblo, W. J. Smid & K. McCartan (eds), Challenges in the management of people convicted of a sexual offence: A way forward. (pp. 121-137). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-80212-7_8 *Craig, L. A., Thorthon, D., Beech, A., & Browne, K. D. (2007). The relationship of statistical and psychological risk markers to sexual reconviction in child molesters. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(3), 314–329. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854806291416 Csárdi, G. (2018). igraph: Network analysis and visualization (Version 1.2.2) [Computer software]. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/igraph/index.html
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw