& 164 REFERENCES Csárdi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The Igraph software package for complex network research [Computer software]. InterJournal Complex Systems, 1695. http://www.interjournal.org/manuscript_abstract.php?361100992 Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2648573 de Beurs, E., den Hollander-Gijsman, M. E., van Rood, Y. R., van der Wee, N. J., Giltay, E. J., van Noorden, M. S., van der Lem, R., van Fenema, E., & Zitman, F. G. (2011). Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: Practical experiences with a web-based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.696 DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004 Dejonckheere, E., & Erbas, J. (2021). Designing an experience sampling study. In: I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (eds), The open handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies (pp. 33–70). Center for Research on Experience Sampling and Ambulatory Methods https:// www. kuleuven.be/samenwerking/real/real-book Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., Kazi, S., Mouyi, A., Žebec, M. S., Kazali, E., Golino, H., Bakracevic, K., & Shayer, M. (2017). Developmental differentiation and binding of mental processes with g through the life-span. Journal of Intelligence, 5(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020023 de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2009). SAPROF. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. English version. Forum Educatief. de Vries Robbé, M. (2014). Protective factors: Validation of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatry (doctoral thesis). Radboud Universiteit. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/ bitstream/handle/2066/126440/126440.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y) de Vries Robbé, M., De Vogel, V., Koster, K., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214550168 Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(3), 347–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347 Dworkin, E. R. (2020). Risk for mental disorders associated with sexual assault: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(5), 1011–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018813198 Dworkin, E. R., Krahé, B., & Zinzow, H. (2021). The global prevalence of sexual assault: A systematic review of international research since 2010. Psychology of Violence, 11(5), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/ vio0000374 Edens, J. F., Penson, B. N., Ruchensky, J. R., Cox, J., & Smith, S. T. (2016). Interrater reliability of Violence Risk Appraisal Guide scores provided in Canadian criminal proceedings. Psychological Assessment, 28(12), 1543–1549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000278 Eher, R., Hofer, S., Buchgeher, A., Domany, S., Turner, D., & Olver. M.E. (2020). The predictive properties of psychiatric diagnoses, dynamic risk and dynamic risk change assessed by the VRS-SO in forensically admitted and released sexual offenders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 922. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyt.2019.00922 *Eher, R., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., Haubner-Maclean, T., & Rettenberger, M. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211403164 *Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Gaunersdorfer, K., Haubner-MacLean, T., Matthes, A., Schilling, F., & Mokros, A. (2013). Über die Treffsicherheit der standardisierter Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren Static-99 und Stable-2007 bei aus einer Sicherungs maβnahme entlassenen Sexualstraftätern [On the accuracy of the standardardized risk assessment procedures Static-99 and Stable-2007 for sexual offenders released from detention.]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 7, 264–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11757-013-0212-9 *Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A., & Schilling, F. (2010). Stable dynamic risk factors in child sexual abusers: The incremental predictive power of narcissistic personality traits beyond the Static-99/Stable-2007 priority categories on sexual reoffense. Sexual Offender Treatment, 5(1), 1–12. http://www.sexual-offendertreatment.org/2-2010_02.html Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2013). A U.K. cost-benefit analysis of circles of support and accountability interventions. Sexual Abuse, 25(3), 211–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063212443385 Epskamp, S. (2020). Graphicalvar: Graphical ar for experience sampling data [Computer software manual]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=graphicalVAR Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavioral Research Methods, 50, 195–212.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw