& 168 REFERENCES Kossakowski, J. J. (2020). Under pressure: Studying complex and causal systems in psychopathology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/d27af0b0-55b7-4597-8a5d9e00cff5e73f Krasny-Pacini, A., & Evans, J. (2018). Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 61(3), 164–179. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002 Kroeze, R., van der Veen, D. C., Servaas, M. N., Bastiaansen, J. A., Oude Voshaar, R. C., Borsboom, D., Ruhe, H. G., Schoevers, R. A., & Riese, H. (2017). Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: A proof-of-principle study. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17505/ jpor.2017.01 *Kropp, P. R. (2001, April). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the founding conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Kuppens, p., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2022). Research questions that can be answered with ESM research. In I. MyinGermeys & P. Kuppens (Eds.), The open handbook of experience sampling methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies (2nd ed. pp. 21-32). Center for Research on Experience Sampling and Ambulatory Methods Leuven. Kuznetsov, Y. A. (2013). Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer-Verlag. Labrecque, R. M., Smith, P., Lovins, B. K., & Latessa, E. J. (2014). The importance of reassessment: How changes in the LSI-R risk score can improve the prediction of recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2013.868389 Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7 Langley, D. J., Wijn, R., Epskamp, S., & van Bork, R. (2015). Should I get that jab? Exploring influence to encourage vaccination via online social media. ECIS 2015 Researchin-Progress Papers (Paper 64). http:// aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=ecis2015_rip Långström, N., Babchishin, K. M., Fazel, S., Lichtenstein, P., & Frisell, T. (2015). Sexual offending runs in families: A 37-year nationwide study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(2), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ije/dyv029 *Lasher, M. P., McGrath, R. J., & Cumming, G. F. (2013, November). The Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk-2 and the Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale: A model of static and dynamic risk assessment. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Chicago, IL. Laws, D. R. (2000). Sexual offending as a public health problem: A North American perspective. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 5(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600008413294 Lee, S. C. (2018). Cross-cultural validity of actuarial risk assessment instruments for individuals in North America with a history of sexual offending: Static-99R and Static-2002R (Doctoral dissertation). Carleton University. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2018-13462 *Lofthouse, R. E. (2013). Risk factors for offending behaviour in adults with an intellectual disability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bangor University. https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/files/20576317/null *Lofthouse, R. E., Lindsay, W. R., Totsika, V., Hastings, R. P., Boer, D. P., & Haaven, J. L. (2013). Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(5), 394 – 403. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/jar.12029 *Looman, J., & Abracen, J. (2012, October). Long-term follow-up of two groups of sex offenders. Presentation at the 31st Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Denver, CO. *Looman, J., Abracen, J., Serin, R., & Marquis, P. (2005). Psychopathy, treatment change, and recidivism in high-risk, high-need sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 549–568. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0886260504271583 *Looman, J., & Goldstein, J. (2014, October). Incremental validity of the STABLE-2007 with the Static-99R. Presentation at the 33st Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, CA. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0011128705281747 *Lussier, P., Deslauriers-Varin, N., & Râtel, T. (2010). A descriptive profile of high-risk sex offenders under intensive supervision in the province of British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(1), 71–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08323236 Lussier, P., McCuish, E. C., & Cale, J. (2020). Understanding sexual offending: An evidence-based response to myths and misconceptions. Springer. Maathuis, M., Drton, M., Lauritzen, S., & Wainwright, M. (2018). Handbook of Graphical Models. CRC Press.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw