3 76 CHAPTER 3 interest, the CS-coefficient of strength, varied from .28 for the network including sexual recidivism to .44 for the networks without recidivism and with violent (including sexual contact) recidivism. Thus, differences between nodes with respect to strength centrality should be interpreted with caution. Section B in the Supplemental Material contains the subset bootstrap and the CScoefficients of the strength centrality for all three networks. A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 sxr Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Sexual recidivism sxr: Sexual recidivism Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders and sexual recidivism measured by the STABLE−2007 A1 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Cutoff: 0.08 A1 B3 B4 B5 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B2 D3 sxr Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Sexual recidivism sxr: Sexual recidivism Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 vir Significant social influenes Intimacy deficits B3: Hostility toward women General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Violent recidivism vir: Violent recidivism Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders and violent recidivism measured by the STABLE−2007 A1 B3 B5 E1 C1 C2 B2 sxr Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Sexual recidivism sxr: Sexual recidivism Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 vir Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Violent recidivism vir: Violent recidivism Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders and violent recidivism measured by the STABLE−2007 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 sxr Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Sexual recidivism sxr: Sexual recidivism Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders and sexual recidivism measured by the STABLE−2007 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 vir Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders and violent recidivism measured by the STABLE−2007 A B Fig. 3.3. Network depicting shortest paths between each adult male dynamic risk factor and (a) sexual recidivism (n = 611) and (b) violent (including sexual contact) recidivism (n = 611). The generated graph in (a) may give the appearance of a mediated effect of significant social influences. However, the connection between emotional identification with children and sexual recidivism is direct, not mediated. Dashed lines represent background connections within the network. Solid lines represent shortest paths. The nodes are defined as follows: Significant social influences: A1 = significant social influences; intimacy deficits: B1 = capacity for relationship stability, B2 = emotional identification with children, B3 = hostility toward women, B4 = general social rejection/ loneliness, B5 = lack of concern for others; general self-regulation: C1 = impulsive acts, C2 = poor cognitive problem solving, C3 = negative emotionality/hostility; sexual self-regulation: D1 = sexual preoccupation, D2 = sex as coping, D3 = deviant sexual interests; cooperation with supervision: E1 = cooperation with supervision; sexual recidivism: sxr = sexual recidivism; and violent recidivism: vir = violent recidivism. Figure and legend adapted with permission from “The Application of Network Analysis to Dynamic Risk Factors in Adult Male Sex Offenders,” by J. W. van den Berg et al., 2020, Clinical Psychological Science, 8(3), p. 549. Copyright © 2020 by the Author(s).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw