4 94 CHAPTER 4 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders measured by the STABLE−2007−DSP −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders measured by the STABLE−2007−BC −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B4 B5 D2 E1 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B4 B5 D2 E1 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders measured by the STABLE−2007−DSP −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 Network dynamic risk factors sex offenders measured by the STABLE−2007−BC −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B4 B5 D2 E1 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B4 B5 D2 E1 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A1 B3 B4 B5 D1 D2 E1 C1 C2 C3 B1 B2 D3 Significant social influenes A1: Significant social influences Intimacy deficits B1: Capacity for relationship stability B2: Emotional Identification with children B3: Hostility toward women B4: General social rejection/loneliness B5: Lack of concern for others General self−regulation C1: Impulsive acts C2: Poor cognitive problem solving C3: Negative emotionality/hostility Sexual self−regulation D1: Sexual preoccupation D2: Sex as coping D3: Deviant sexual interests Cooperation with supervision E1: Cooperation with supervision Cutoff: 0.08 Maximum: 1 −2.0 −0.7 0.5 1.8 E1 D3 D2 D1 C3 C2 C1 B5 B4 B3 B2 B1 A1 A B C D Figure 4.1. Networks of dynamic risk factors of adult men who have sexually offended Note. (a, c) Estimated network structure from of 13 dynamic risk factors as measured by the STABLE-2007 (1a, upper left, DSP Sample, n=788; 1c, lower left, BC sample, n=3,864). The network structures are mgm networks, in which a connection between nodes represents the strength of the statistical association that remains after statistically controlling for the other nodes. (b, d) Strength centrality of the estimated network structure of 13 adult male dynamic risk factors as measured by the STABLE-2007 (1b, upper right, DSP sample, n =788; 1d, lower right, BC sample, n =3,864). Strength centrality is shown as standardized z scores. DSP = dynamic supervision project; BC = British Columbia; mgm = mixed graphical models. Figure and legend adapted with permission from “ Dynamic Risk Factors in Adult Men Who Committed Sexual Offenses: Replication and Comparison of Networks Found in Two Independent Samples,” by J. W. van den Berg et al., 2022, Psychology of Violence, 12(6), p. 424–437. Copyright © 2022 American Psychological Association.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw