145 BIBLIOGRAPHY Castelfranchi, C. (1995). Intelligence Agents: Thories, Architectures, and Languages. Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture, (edited by M. Wooldridge and NR Jennings), Springer. Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2003). From automaticity to autonomy: the frontier of artificial agents. In Agent Autonomy (pp. 103-136): Springer. Cavalcante Siebert, L., Lupetti, M. L., Aizenberg, E., Beckers, N., Zgonnikov, A., Veluwenkamp, H., . . . Jonker, C. M. (2023). Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 241255. Cheng, A. S., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2010). Developing a meta‐inventory of human values. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-10. Clarke, R., & Moses, L. B. (2014). The regulation of civilian drones’ impacts on public safety. Computer law & security review, 30(3), 263-285. Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. Frances Pinter, London Cordeschi, R. (2013). Automatic decision-making and reliability in robotic systems: some implications in the case of robot weapons. Ai & Society, 28(4), 431-441. Cornwall, A. (2008). “Unpacking Participation: Models, Meanings, and Practices.” Community Development Journal 43 (3): 269–83. Côté, N., Bouzid, M., & Mouaddib, A.-I. (2011). Integrating the human recommendations in the decision process of autonomous agents: A goal biased markov decision process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AAAI 2011 Fall Symposium Robot-Human Teamwork in Dynamic Adverse Environmen. Crootof, R. (2015). War torts: Accountability for autonomous weapons. U. Pa. L. Rev., 164, 1347. Cummings, M. L. (2006). Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and engineering ethics, 12(4), 701-715. Cummings, M. L. (2006a). Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/90321 Cummings, M. L. (2006b). Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and engineering ethics, 12(4), 701-715. Davis, J., & Nathan, L. P. (2015). Value Sensitive Design: Applications, Adaptations, and Critiques. Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, 11-40. Dawes, J. (2023). Killer robots are the future of warfare and the ‘inevitable next step’ in Russia’s long bloody invasion of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://fortune.com/2023/02/21/killer-robots-a-i-future-warfare-russia-ukraineinvasion/ de Ágreda, Á. G. (2020). Ethics of autonomous weapons systems and its applicability to any AI systems. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101953. Dennis, L., Fisher, M., Slavkovik, M., & Webster, M. (2016). Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 77, 1-14. De Wet, E. (2008). Holding international institutions accountable: the complementary role of non-judicial oversight mechanisms and judicial review. German Law Journal, 9(11), 1987-2012. Dickinson, L. (2018). Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: The Overlooked Importance of Administrative Accountability. Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: The overlooked importance of administrative accountability, in The Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Law of Armed Conflict (Eric Talbot Jensen & Ronald Alcala eds., Oxford University Press 2018 Forthcoming). Docherty, B. (2012). Losing humanity: The case against killer robots. Human Right Watch, https://www.hrw.org/sites/ default/files/reports/arms1112_ForUpload.pdf Docherty, B. (2015). Mind the gap: The lack of accountability for killer robots: Human Rights Watch. Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 634-649. Ekelhof, M. (2015). Autonome wapens: een verkenning van het concept Meaningful Human Control. Militaire Spectator, 184. Ekelhof, M. (2019). Moving beyond semantics on autonomous weapons: Meaningful human control in operation. Global Policy, 10(3), 343-348. European Commission. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Fishkin, J. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation: Oup Oxford. Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349-379. Friedman, B., & Kahn Jr, P. H. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. The human-computer interaction handbook, 1177-1201. Friedman, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value sensitive design and information systems. In Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory (pp. 55-95): Springer. Galliott, J. (2015). Military robots: Mapping the moral landscape: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Gardner, J. (2007). The Mark of Responsibility. In Offences and Defences (pp. 177–200): Oxford University Press. General Assembly United Nations. (2016). Joint report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw