147 BIBLIOGRAPHY Luppicini, R., & So, A. (2016). A technoethical review of commercial drone use in the context of governance, ethics, and privacy. Technology in society, 46, 109-119. NATO. (2016). ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR JOINT TARGETING Edition A Version 1 Retrieved from https://assets. publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628215/20160505nato_targeting_ajp_3_9.pdf NATO. (2017). AJP-01 ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ajp-01-d-allied-joint-doctrine Mohan, G. (2001). “Participatory Development.” In The Arnold Companion to Development Studies, edited by V. Desai and R. Potter, 49–54. London: Hodder Arnold. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1753-1760. Marchant, G. E., Allenby, B., Arkin, R. C., Barrett, E. T., Borenstein, J., Gaudet, L. M., . . . O’Meara, R. (2011). International governance of autonomous military robots. Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems, 54(1), 11-22. Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175-183. McClelland, J. (2003). The review of weapons in accordance with Article 36 of Additional Protocol I. International Review of the Red Cross, 85(850), 397-420. Mecacci, G., & Santoni De Sio, F. (2019). Meaningful human control as reason-responsiveness: the case of dual-mode vehicles. Ethics and Information Technology. Melancon, A.-A. (2020). What’s wrong with drones? Automatization and target selection. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 31(4), 801-821. Meloni, C. (2016). State and Individual Responsibility for Targeted Killings by Drones. Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Technical Perspectives on Remotely Controlled Weapons, 47. Miller, K. W., Wolf, M. J., & Grodzinsky, F. (2017). This “ethical trap” is for roboticists, not robots: on the issue of artificial agent ethical decision-making. Science and engineering ethics, 23(2), 389-401. Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever‐expanding concept? Public administration, 78(3), 555-573. Open Roboethics initiative. (2015, 5-11-2015). The Ethics and Governance of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: An International Public Opinion Poll. Retrieved from http://www.openroboethics.org/laws_survey_released/ Pelizzo, R., Stapenhurst, R., & Olson, D. (2006). Parliamentary oversight for government accountability. Retrieved from https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1136&context=soss_research Pesch, U. (2015). Engineers and active responsibility. Science and engineering ethics, 21(4), 925-939. Pigeau, R., & McCann, C. (2002). Re-conceptualizing command and control. Defence R & D Canada-Toronto. Pigmans, K. (2020). Value Deliberation: Towards mutual understanding of stakeholder perspectives in policymaking. Retrieved from https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/value-deliberation-towards-mutual-understandingof-stakeholder-pe Pigmans, K., Dignum, V., & Doorn, N. (2021). Group proximity and mutual understanding: measuring onsite impact of a citizens’ summit. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 228-250. Ricard, M., & Kolitz, S. (2003). The ADEPT framework for intelligent autonomy. Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Incorporated. Roff, H. M. (2013). Responsibility, liability, and lethal autonomous robots. Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War Theory in the 21st Century. Routledge, 352-364. Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public administration review, 227-238. Radin, B. A., & Romzek, B. S. (1996). Accountability expectations in an intergovernmental arena: The national rural development partnership. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 26(2), 59-81. Rao, B., Gopi, A. G., & Maione, R. (2016). The societal impact of commercial drones. Technology in society, 45, 83-90. Roff, H. M. (2013). Responsibility, liability, and lethal autonomous robots (pp. 352–364)., Routledge handbook of ethics and war: just war theory in the 21st century Abingdon: Routledge. Roff, H. M. (2016). Weapons autonomy is rocketing. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/28/weapons-autonomy-is-rocketing/ Roff, H. M., & Moyes, R. (2016). Meaningful human control, artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons. Paper presented at the Briefing Paper Prepared for the Informal Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Rosén, F. (2014). Extremely stealthy and incredibly close: drones, control and legal responsibility. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19(1), 113-131. Rosenberg, M., & Markoff, J. (2016). The Pentagon’s ‘Terminator Conundrum’: Robots That Could Kill on Their Own. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/us/pentagon-artificial-intelligence-terminator.html?_r=0 Royakkers, L., & Orbons, S. (2015). Design for Values in the Armed Forces: Nonlethal Weapons Weapons and Military
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw