149 BIBLIOGRAPHY Van de Poel, I. (2011). The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In Moral responsibility (pp. 37-52): Springer. Van de Poel, I. (2013). Translating values into design requirements. In Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 253-266): Springer. van der Vecht, B. (2009). Adjustable autonomy: Controling influences on decision making (Doctoral dissertation, University Utrecht). van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2014). Ethicist as Designer: a pragmatic approach to ethics in the lab. Science and engineering ethics, 20(4), 947-961. van Wynsberghe, A., & Comes, T. (2020). Drones in humanitarian contexts, robot ethics, and the human–robot interaction. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(1), 43-53. Vanderelst, D., & Winfield, A. (2018). An architecture for ethical robots inspired by the simulation theory of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 48, 56-66. Verbruggen, M., & Boulanin, V. (2017). SIPRI Compendium on Article 36 Reviews. Retrieved from https://researchportal. vub.be/en/publications/sipri-compendium-on-article-36-reviews Verdiesen, I. (2017). How do we ensure that we remain in control of our autonomous weapons? AI Matters, 3(3), 47–55. doi:10.1145/3137574.3137585 Verdiesen, I. (2017). Agency perception and moral values related to Autonomous Weapons: An empirical study using the Value-Sensitive Design approach. Verdiesen, I., Aler Tubella, A., & Dignum, V. (2021). Integrating Comprehensive Human Oversight in Drone Deployment: A Conceptual Framework Applied to the Case of Military Surveillance Drones. Information, 12(9), 385. Verdiesen, I., & Dignum, V. (2022). Value elicitation on a scenario of autonomous weapon system deployment: a qualitative study based on the value deliberation process. AI and Ethics, 1-14. Verdiesen, I., Dignum, V., & Hoven, J. V. D. (2018). Measuring moral acceptability in E-deliberation: A practical application of ethics by participation. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 18(4), 1-20. Verdiesen, I., De Sio, F. S., & Dignum, V. (2019). Moral Values Related to Autonomous Weapon Systems: An Empirical Survey that Reveals Common Ground for the Ethical Debate. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 38(4), 34-44. Vignard, K. (2014). The weaponization of increasingly autonomous technologies: considering how meaningful human control might move discussion forward. UNIDIR Resources, 2. Wagner, M. (2014). The dehumanization of international humanitarian law: Legal, ethical, and political implications of autonomous weapon systems. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 47, 1371. Walsh, J. I., & Schulzke, M. (2015). The Ethics of Drone Strikes: Does Reducing the Cost of Conflict Encourage War? Retrieved from Westergaard, M., Evangelista, S., & Kristensen, L. M. (2009). ASAP: an extensible platform for state space analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets. Williams, A. P., Scharre, P. D., & Mayer, C. (2015). Developing Autonomous Systems in an Ethical Manner. In Autonomous Systems: Issues for Defence Policymakers: NATO Allied Command Transformation (Capability Engineering and Innovation). Williams, G. (2008). Responsibility as a virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(4), 455-470. Williams, J. (2015). Democracy and regulating autonomous weapons: biting the bullet while missing the point? Global Policy, 6(3), 179-189. Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The knowledge engineering review, 10(2), 115-152. Wright, G. H. v. (1981). On the logic of norms and actions. In New studies in deontic logic (pp. 3-35): Springer.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw