153 R 0(0). Taylor & Francis: 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577. Carey TE and Lizotte M-K (2019) Political experience and the intersection between race and gender. Politics, Groups, and Identities 7(2): 243–266. DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2017.1354036. Cargile IAM and Pringle L (2019) Context Not Candidate Sex: A Case Study of Female Vote Choice for Mayor. Urban Affairs Review. DOI: 10.1177/1078087419861697. Carlson E (2015) Ethnic Voting and Accountability in Africa: A Choice Experiment in Uganda. World Politics 67(2): 353–385. DOI: 10.1017/ S0043887115000015. Carnes N and Lupu N (2016) Do voters dislike working-class candidates? Voter biases and the descriptive underrepresentation of the working class. American Political Science Review 110(4): 832–844. DOI: 10.1017/ S0003055416000551. Cassese EC, Huddy L, Hartman TK, et al. (2013) Socially mediated internet surveys: Recruiting participants for online experiments. PS - Political Science and Politics 46(4): 775–784. DOI: 10.1017/ S1049096513001029. Castelli L, Arcuri L and Carraro L (2009) Projection processes in the perception of political leaders. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 31(3): 189–196. DOI: 10.1080/01973530903058151. Celis K and Mügge LM (2018) Whose equality? Measuring group representation. Politics 38(2): 197–213. DOI: 10.1177/0263395716684527. Chauchard S (2016) Unpacking Ethnic Preferences: Theory and Micro-Level Evidence From North India. Comparative Political Studies 49(2): 253 –284. DOI: 10.1177/0010414015609356. Cheung JH, Burns DK, Sinclair RR, et al. (2017) Amazon Mechanical Turk in Organizational Psychology: An Evaluation and Practical Recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology 32(4). Springer US: 347–361. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5. Choi DD, Poertner M and Sambanis N (2022) Native Bias: Overcoming Discrimination against Immigrants. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691222325. Coffé H and von Schoultz Å (2020) How candidate characteristics matter: Candidate profiles, political sophistication, and vote choice. Politics: 026339572092207. DOI: 10.1177/0263395720922077. Conover PJ and Feldman S (1989) Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes. American Journal of Political Science 33(4): 912–940. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2307/2111115. Coppock A and Green DP (2015) Assessing the Correspondence between Experimental Results Obtained in the Lab and Field: A Review of Recent Social Science Research. Political Science Research and Methods 3(01): 113–131. DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2014.10. Coppock A and McClellan OA (2018) Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained from a New Source of Online Survey Respondents. Working Paper. DOI: 10.1177/2053168018822174. Costa M (2021) Ideology, Not Affect: What Americans Want from Political Representation. American Journal of Political Science 65(2): 342–358. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12571. Cowley P (2013) Why not ask the audience Understanding the public’s representational priorities. British Politics 8(2): 138–163. DOI: 10.1057/bp.2012.28. Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1): 139–167. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/ chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315051536-2/ demarginalizing-intersection-race-sexkimberle-crenshaw Accessed on August 16 2023. Crowder-Meyer M, Gadarian SK, Trounstine J, et al. (2018) A Different Kind of Disadvantage: Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice. Political Behavior (0123456789). Springer US. DOI: 10.1007/ s11109-018-9505-1. Cutler F (2002) The simplest shortcut of all: Sociodemographic characteristics and electoral choice. Journal of Politics 64(2): 466–490. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2508.00135. Dafoe A, Zhang B and Caughey D (2018) Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments. Political Analysis 26(4): 399– 416. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2018.9. Dahl M and Nyrup J (2021) Confident and cautious candidates: Explaining underrepresentation of women in Danish
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjY0ODMw